Cases 31 - 40 of 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HARRELL v. DODGE COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
LISTER HARRELL
Defendant:
DODGE COUNTY GEORGIA , TIM VAUGHN , LYNN SHEFFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. United States Fire Insurance Company et al
as 4:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Dennis Harrell
Defendant:
United States Fire Insurance Company and Blue Star Claims Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. Brickhouse et al
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
Chyvonne E. Harrell
Defendant:
William Brickhouse, Ph.D., MHM Correctional Services, Inc., Nekeya Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv01128
Plaintiff:
Floyd Harrell and Dianne A. Harrell
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. , Primary Capital Advisors LC and Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrell v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00132
Petitioner:
David Harrell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Cates et al
as 1:2017cv03102
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Ronald Harrell Cates, Tamra Harrell Cates and Donna Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Harrell v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv02499
Plaintiff:
Chyvonne E. Harrell
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, William Brickhouse , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Julie Harrell
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilson v. Brookhaven Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv01210
Plaintiff:
Edward Fair Wilson, II
Defendant:
Brookhaven Police Department, DeKalb County District Attorney's Office, Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
