Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Beckett v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2017cv03998
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hayes Beckett
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and La Paz County Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02417
Plaintiff:
Karen Hayes and Stephen Hayes
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv01694
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Hayes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hayes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
Emile Hayes
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Babeu et al
as 2:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Copeland, Sr.
Defendant:
Paul Babeu, Unknown Hudson, Unknown Schlebaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv04190
Petitioner:
Kasey Markeith Hayes
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Morris et al
as 2:2016cv02756
Plaintiff:
Francisca Flores
Defendant:
Stephen Morris, Dorinda Hayes, Kenneth Filly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes #059437 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02181
Plaintiff:
Carlester Sherrod Hayes
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Marce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02061
Plaintiff:
Curley Gene Hayes
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayes v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00337
Petitioner:
William Hayes, Jr
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
