Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
SIMMERS v. WILSON et al
as 2:2007cv01896
Petitioner: JOSEPH H. SIMMERS
Respondent: HARRY WILSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'TOOLE v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv00590
Plaintiff: BRIAN O'TOOLE
Defendant: JEFFREY BEARD, HARRY WILSON, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
JACOBS v. BEARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00514
Plaintiff: ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant: JEFFREY BEARD, JOHN SHAFFER, FRED MAUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GAY v. WILSON et al
as 2:2007cv01119
Petitioner: DERRICK GAY
Respondent: HARRY WILSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HODGES v. WILSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00249
Plaintiff: ALONZO HODGES
Defendant: HARRY WILSON, HARRY WILSON, SHELLY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. LT. A. ABEREGG et al
as 2:2007cv00215
Plaintiff: TERRANCE WASHINGTON
Defendant: LT. A. ABEREGG, SGT. L.M. RUVO, HARRY WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. HERBIK et al
as 2:2007cv00196
Plaintiff: EARL THOMAS
Defendant: MICHAEL HERBIK, HARRY WILSON, ROBERT TRETINICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEARY v. WILSON et al
as 2:2007cv00059
Petitioner: TYRONE GEARY
Respondent: HARRY WILSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?