Cases 31 - 40 of 69
HOLT et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04185
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOLT , RAY PINNEY , RANDALL BEISLER and others
Receiver:
JACQUELINE SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK T. RAY
Defendant:
JEFF ROGERS, DAVID MITCHELL, COI HARKLEROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. VIDONISH et al
as 2:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
PETER VIDONISH, CRAIG HAYWOOD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWOOD v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
as 2:2011cv01200
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HAYWOOD
Defendant:
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Counter_claimant:
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Counter_defendant:
MICHAEL A. HAYWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WASHINGTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BYUNGHAK JIN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWOOD v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv35191
Plaintiff:
WILBERT HAYWOOD
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JORDAN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv00815
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JORDAN
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO, SERGEANT MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARKS et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62062
Plaintiff:
HAYWOOD H. MARKS and ROSIE L MARKS
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC, GAF CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAGATKO v. HAYWOOD et al
as 2:2010cv01752
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS GAGATKO
Defendant:
HAYWOOD and WINFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTELLI v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv01629
Plaintiff:
KEITH BARTELLI
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , JEFFREY BEARD , LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
