Cases 31 - 40 of 63
(PC) Hayes v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Tevin Hayes
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Artel Brown
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gadison v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rayshon Gadison
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Leverette v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Dante Leverette
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chaves v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Danny Chaves
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackie Rogers v. Heather Shirley
as 23-55300
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKIE JEROME ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
HEATHER SHIRLEY
(HC)Thomas v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom and State of California
Defendant:
Scott Degough and Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Collins, et al. v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Terion Collins, Marshall Rayshawn, Justin Marquiz Jackson and others
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Briggs v. Shirley
as 1:2023cv00471
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Briggs
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
