Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Jackie Rogers v. Heather Shirley
as 23-55300
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKIE JEROME ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
HEATHER SHIRLEY
(HC)Thomas v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Petitioner:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom and State of California
Defendant:
Scott Degough and Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Collins, et al. v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Terion Collins, Marshall Rayshawn, Justin Marquiz Jackson and others
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Thomas et al v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Thomas, Terrence Dunson, Michael Greene and others
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J. Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Briggs v. Shirley
as 1:2023cv00471
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Briggs
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Keller v. Shirley et al
as 1:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
Paul Stephen Keller
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, James Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Powell v. Heather Shirley
as 22-55787
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN D. POWELL
Respondent / Appellee:
HEATHER SHIRLEY, Acting Warden
William Deauntae Shehee v. Heather Shirley
as 2:2022cv05293
Petitioner:
William Deauntae Shehee
Defendant:
Warden Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaron Deon Seymour v. Heather Shirley
as 2:2022cv04258
Petitioner:
Aaron Deon Seymour
Defendant:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston Michael Boji v. Heather Shirley
as 2:2022cv02410
Petitioner:
Houston Michael Boji
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
