Cases 31 - 40 of 406
Holmes v. Chaudry et al
as 9:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Holmes
Defendant:
Dr. Chaudry, Dr. Mohammed, Nurse Paladino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Howard
as 9:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Holmes v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Jessica Holmes
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Orentlikher v. Holmes et al
as 1:2022cv10564
Plaintiff:
OLEG ORENTLIKHER
Defendant:
CARL HOLMES and SEVEN STARS EQUIPMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes v. State of New York DOC and Comm Supervision et al
as 9:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Casanova Holmes
Defendant:
State of New York DOC and Comm Supervision, John Doe and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Fersinda et al
as 9:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes and Misso Holmes
Defendant:
Fersinda, D. Carbanero, R. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
as 1:2022cv09301
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
