Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Reece et al v. AES Corporation et al
as 6:2012cv00457
Defendant:
Star Bulk, MMHF, LLC, SEECO, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Reece, Bennett Tanksley, Charles Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holmes v. Oatman et al
as 4:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Charles Holmes
Defendant:
Mark Oatman, Natasha Parks, Otis Hughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Star Insurance Company v. Bear Productions, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Star Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bear Productions, Inc. , William Reese , Diane Reese and others
Counter_claimant:
Bear Productions, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Star Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Holmes v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00838
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong et al v. Tyson Foods et al
as 6:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Rusty Armstrong, Rusty Armstrong, Diane Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
