Cases 31 - 40 of 113
Hunter v. Finch
as 4:2019cv00164
Plaintiff:
Mary E Hunter
Defendant:
Thomas E Finch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04276
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Terrence M Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03187
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mark Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter #147483 v. Fields et al
as 4:2019cv00051
Plaintiff:
Brian Shalom Hunter
Defendant:
Kristi Sekavec, Cary Johnson, Karen L Bustamante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01240
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nakia Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00832
Defendant:
Combe Products Incorporated, Combe Laboratories Incorporated, Combe International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
James Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00855
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Unknown Parties and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hunter and Thomas L Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv04096
Defendant:
Isaiah Ford, Unknown Parties, Salvatore Ricotta and others
Plaintiff:
Chase Matthews, Hunter Fry and Brandon Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04369
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kemene A Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter #147483 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00457
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Brian Shalom Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
