Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Robinson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2014cv05274
Plaintiff:
Allan LM Robinson
Defendant:
Vance Johnson, Karen Johnson , Michael Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aainfinity v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
Spaceman O Aainfinity
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Attorney General, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. CAPITAL INN, INC.
as 2:2012mc00212
Plaintiff:
Days Inn Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
CAPITAL INN, INC.
Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Sweet Dream Inn Inc. et al
as 2:2012mc00163
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Defendant:
Sweet Dream Inn Inc., Duke B. Yoon and Young S. Yoon
Garnishee:
Key Bank
Days Inns Worldwide Inc v. Nomiju Corp et al
as 2:2012mc00162
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide Inc
Defendant:
Nomiju Corp
Garnishee:
Pacific International Bank
Days Inns Worldwide Inc v. Nomiju Corp., et al
as 2:2012mc00129
Plaintiff:
Days Inns Worldwide Inc
Defendant:
Nomiju Corp., et al
Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Sweet Dream Inn Inc. et al
as 2:2012mc00108
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Defendant:
Sweet Dream Inn Inc., Duke B. Yoon and Young S. Yoon
California Bank & Trust v. Shilo Inn Moses Lake Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
California Bank & Trust
Defendant:
Shilo Inn Moses Lake Inc , Moses Lake Food Mart Inc and Kohli Investment Inc
Counter_claimant:
Shilo Inn Moses Lake Inc
Counter_defendant:
California Bank & Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Medina v. United States et al
as 2:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Juan Medina
Defendant:
United States, Shane Innes, Sr, Jackie Innes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BPO Properties Ltd v. Lee et al
as 3:2011cv05552
Defendant:
Soon-Mo Lee, Young Ja Lee, Portage Inn Inc and others
Plaintiff:
BPO Properties Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
