Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Tafari v. Hogan
as 12-4304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant:
Diane Vanburen, Deputy Commissioner, DOCS
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Hogan, Commissioner, Office of Mental Health, Donald Sawyer, Executive Director of CNY Psychiatric Center, Jean Berggren, Psychiatrist II, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Tafari v. Fischer
as 9:2012cv01236
Petitioner:
InJah Tafari
Respondent:
Brian S. Fischer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tafari v. Rock
as 12-2847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
David A. Rock, Superintendent, John Miller, Lieutenant, Clinton Correctional Facility, sued in individual and official capacity, James Facteau, Captain, Clinton Correctional Facility, sued in individual and official capacity and others
Tafari v. Rock
as 12-2767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick Griffin, Captain, Eastern Correctional Facility, sued in individual and official capacity, K. Simmons, Lieutenant, Eastern Correctional Facility, sued in individual and official capacity, Peter Healy, Deputy Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, sued in individual and official capacity and others
Tafari v. Rock
as 12-2739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
David A. Rock, Superintendent, Lucien J. LeClaire, Jr., Robert Schattinger and others
Tafari v. Superintendent
as 12-2842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent, Curtis Drown and Donald Selsky
Tafari v. Prack
as 12-2699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Venettozzi, Assistant Director of Special Housing Unit, Albert Prack, Director of Special Housing Unit, Denise Maas, R.N. and others
Tafari v. Bilow et al
as 9:2012cv01062
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
David Bilow, Timothy Ramsdell, Jerry Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
