Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Alan Kreilein v. Gwendolyn Horth, et al
as 20-1994
Defendant / Appellee:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, Chair, Indiana Parole Board and ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner, Indiana Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN KREILEIN
Antonio Cantu v. DOJ, et al
as 20-1772
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO CANTU, also known as TONY CANTU
HARRIS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2020cv01165
Plaintiff:
BARDLEY J. HARRIS and BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
CONTRACTORS OF THE INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTU v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2019cv00608
Respondent:
CURTIS HILL, JR., INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CANTU, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEYBA v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2019cv00226
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, WARDEN and ERIC HOLCOMB
Petitioner:
ERWIN LEYBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cantu v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv00355
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Tony Cantu
Defendant:
Crawford, French, Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. NOBBLIT et al
as 4:2019cv00068
Defendant:
MIKE FEECE, JUSTIN NOBBLIT, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TWITCHELL v. STATE OF INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 2:2019cv00114
Petitioner:
DEVAN TWITCHELL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COX v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv00638
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, STANLEY KNIGHT, DOC OMBUDSMAN BUREAU and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. Indiana Parole Board et al
as 3:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
Marshall Lackey, II
Defendant:
John Doe and Indiana Parole Board
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
