Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Gomez et al v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv23529
Plaintiff:
Javier Gomez and Karla Gomez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Javier Gomez v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 12-3568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF LANCASTER, Lancaster County, STREET OPERATIONS GROUP LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, L.C.P. and others
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2012cv04524
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., THE CITY OF LANCASTER (LANC. COUNTY), STREET OPERATIONS GROUP, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON (L.C.P.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jose Gomez-Colin
as 12-10625
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOE JAVIER GOMEZ-COLIN, a.k.a. Javier Colin, a.k.a. Jose Javier Gomez
Gomez v. First Horizon, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv01881
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, First Horizon, N.A. and Nationstar Morgage, LLC
Plaintiff:
Javier Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA v. Marco Guzman
as 11-50461
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO GAMBOA GUZMAN, AKA Pedro Rodriguez Flores, AKA Marco Gamboa, AKA Tony Gamboa, AKA Daniel Garcia Guzman, AKA Javier Gomez Mendez, AKA Pedro Quintana Mora, AKA Pedro Mora Quintana, AKA Daniel Dadena Rodriguez
Lopez v. J&J Gomez Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv04943
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lopez
Defendant:
J&J Gomez Corp. and Javier Gomez
Counter_claimant:
J&J Gomez Corp.
Counter_defendant:
J&J Gomez Corp. and Javier Gomez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Francisco Gomez
as 11-13165
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER GOMEZ
USA v. Gomez et al
as 8:2011mj00208
Defendant:
Mario Echeverria (2) and Javier Gomez (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
