Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Stevens v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Stevens
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Castillo-Alvarez v. Krukow
as 5:2014cv04029
Plaintiff:
Juan Humberto Castillo-Alvarez
Defendant:
Randy W Krukow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. $9,088.77 seized from Luana Savings Bank Acct ending in 167 et al
as 6:2014cv02014
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,088.77 seized from Luana Savings Bank Acct ending in 167, $88.77 seized from Luana Savings Bank Acct ending in 191 and $4,576.47 seized from Luana Savings Bank Acct ending in 092
Claimant:
Juan Manzano
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324
Guzman-Garcia v. O'Brien
as 1:2014cv00004
Defendant:
Mary Lou O'Brien and Workmen's Auto Insurance
Plaintiff:
Juan Guzman-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ledezma-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00522
Petitioner:
Juan Ledezma-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J & J Sports Productions, Inc v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc
Defendant:
Euro-Latino, Inc. and Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Arteaga Talavera v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00474
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Arteaga Talavera
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Munoz v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv04083
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Munoz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cedillo v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2012cv00443
Plaintiff:
Juan Cedillo
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Sheryl Lockwood-Dahm, Harbons Deol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. USA
as 4:2012cv00423
Petitioner:
Juan Armas Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
