Cases 31 - 40 of 226
Botelho v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00460
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Botelho
Respondent:
Nevada, State Of and Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00437
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Petitioner:
Larry Allen Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernandez v. Centric et al
as 3:2012cv00401
Defendant:
Dr. Centric, Sgt. Chubert, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00382
Petitioner:
Koo Kwang Jung
Respondent:
Nevada, State Of and Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richmond v. Nevada Attorney General
as 3:2012cv00348
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Petitioner:
Daniel C. Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murguia v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00347
Defendant:
Damon Haycock, Jack Palmer, State of Nevada, ex. rel. Its Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Murguia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Taylor v. Lessard et al
as 3:2012cv00334
Defendant:
Paul Lessard, Jack Palmer and John Walsh
Plaintiff:
James Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fodor v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00330
Petitioner:
William Emery Fodor
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jung v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00324
Petitioner:
Koo Kwang Jung
Respondent:
Nevada, State Of and Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheaton v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00313
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Petitioner:
James Wheaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
