Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Smith v. GBL Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv00347
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
GBL Restaurant Corp., Roy Bernard, Edward Crofton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2010cv01457
Plaintiff:
Sherice E. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ceparano v. Suffolk County, NY et al
as 2:2010cv02030
Defendant:
P.O. "John Doe's #'s 10-50", "Supervisor of Bradford S. Magill", "Supervisor of Patricia Brosco" and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Ceparano
MADD:
Mother's Against Drunk Driving
Peeping Pervert:
Cathy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv04647
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe #1-3 and Richard Roes #4-6
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Axion Power International, Inc. et al v. Mercatus & Partners, Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv11493
Plaintiff:
Axion Power International, Inc., William Ahearn, Tracy Ahearn and others
Defendant:
Mercatus & Partners, Ltd., MF Global, Inc., MF Global, UK Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Steed et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv09839
Plaintiff:
Alberta Steed, Juval Steed and Dantuine Turner
Defendant:
City of New York, Tony Leon, John Fishetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Nassau Health Care Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02450
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Nassau Health Care Corporation, County of Nassau, Nassau County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Graham
as 1:2007cv00832
Petitioner:
James Smith
Respondent:
Graham, Graham and Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
