Cases 31 - 40 of 267
Williams v. Ashtabula Municipal Court et al
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Russell A. Williams
Defendant:
Ashtabula Municipal Court, Ashtabula County Public Defender, Forensic Center of Northeast Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dinger v. Forshey
as 5:2023cv00275
Petitioner:
Christopher Dinger
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diesel v. Commercial Credit Group Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Rocky Diesel
Defendant:
Commercial Credit Group Inc., Daniel J. McDonough, Angelo Garubo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cruz v. Forshey et al
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
John Michael Cruz
Defendant:
Jay Forshey and Head of NCI Medical Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Refinery Management, LLC v. Carbon IQ, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Refinery Management, LLC
Defendant:
Carbon IQ, Inc. A Delaware Corporation doing business as Rumby, Benjamin Cantey and Jason "Jay" Gould
Jay v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03646
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jay
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Belke v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03338
Plaintiff:
Jay Belke
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
