Cases 31 - 40 of 406
De La Rosa v. Lazo et al
as 2:2020cv03652
Defendant:
P.O. Nkosi Henry, P.O. R. Salisbury, P.O. Boris Herrera-Barillas and others
Plaintiff:
Natanael De La Rosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alberta Mosley on behalf of minor son B.W. v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2020cv06487
Plaintiff:
Alberta Mosley on behalf of minor son B.W.
Defendant:
City of Rochester and City of Rochester Police Officers John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv03218
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Sofia Hamid, Police Officers John Doe 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Peter J Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradshaw v. Piccolo et al
as 6:2020cv06368
Defendant:
Ciulla, P. Piccolo, John Doe 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Chappius et al
as 1:2020cv00604
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher v. Chappius et al
as 6:2020cv06330
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Plaintiff:
Johnson Christopher and Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. NYCDOC MDC et al
as 1:2020cv02144
Defendant:
Warden NYCDOC MDC, City of New York and Correctional Officer John Doe 1 & 2
Plaintiff:
Shamone Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Microsoft Corp. v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2020cv01217
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chernick v. Faya et. al.
as 2:2019cv07093
Defendant:
Police Officer Jesus Faya, The County of Suffolk, Officers John Doe #1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Maryann Ost Chernick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
