Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Haskamp et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 0:2011cv02248
Plaintiff:
John M. Haskamp and Carrie L. Haskamp
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jensen v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 0:2011cv02047
Plaintiff:
John M. Jensen
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tuskan v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 0:2011cv01890
Plaintiff:
John M. Tuskan
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hentges v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2010cv04081
Plaintiff:
John M. Hentges
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterman et al v. Nationwide Life Insurance Company
as 0:2010cv03363
Plaintiff:
John M. Peterman and Sara J. Peterman
Defendant:
Nationwide Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clergy Financial, LLC v. Simon et al
as 0:2010cv03319
Plaintiff:
Clergy Financial, LLC
Defendant:
John M. Simon and Clergy Tax and Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Gentile v. Sun Products, Inc. et al
as 0:2010mc00010
Plaintiff:
Robert Gentile
Defendant:
Sun Products, Inc., Sun Hockey, Inc. and John M. Gill
Billings et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02916
Plaintiff:
Diane Mae Billings, Diane Mae Billings, Diane Mae Billings and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Maeberry v. St. Paul, City of et al
as 0:2009cv01216
Plaintiff:
Loyd Maeberry
Defendant:
St. Paul, City of, Amanda Heu, John M. Peck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
