Cases 31 - 40 of 85
SNELLING v. GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00368
Defendant:
DOCTOR BRADFORD, COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2020cv00074
Defendant:
MR ALLS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FULTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF THE FULTON CO. JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snelling v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Bradford, Georgia Department of Corrections, Fulton County Sheriff's Department of the Fulton Co. Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Snelling, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALEY v. Johnson State Prison
as 1:2020cv00793
Respondent:
Johnson State Prison
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALEY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00049
Defendant:
ATTORNEY KATHLEEN FLYNN, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L HALEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALEY v. JOHNSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2019cv00503
Respondent:
JOHNSON STATE PRISON
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALEY v. JOHNSON STATE PRISON
as 1:2020cv00245
Respondent:
Johnson State Prison
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALEY v. FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2019cv00501
Respondent:
FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA and JOHNSON STATE PRISON
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALEY v. FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2020cv00203
Respondent:
Fulton County Georgia, Johnson State Prison and Warden Antoine Caldwell
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SNELLING v. JOHNSON STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Johnson State Prison, CPT DOUGLEY, Officer Gibbs and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SNELLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
