Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Bailey v. Walker et al
as 1:2009cv06250
Plaintiff: De'Markus Bailey
Defendant: Roger E. Walker, Jr. and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Randle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv05538
Petitioner: Michael Davis
Respondent: Michael Randle and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Randle et al
as 1:2009cv05537
Petitioner: De'Markus Bailey
Respondent: Michael Randle and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Randle et al
as 2:2009cv02216
Petitioner: Michael . Davis
Respondent: Michael Randle and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Randle et al
as 2:2009cv02214
Petitioner: De'Markus Bailey
Respondent: Michael Randle and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raine v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2009cv01481
Plaintiff: Christopher Raine, Christopher Raine, Christopher Raine and others
Defendant: Illinois Prisoner Review Board, Jorge Montes, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Hughes v. Walker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01317
Plaintiff: Matthew Hughes
Defendant: Roger E Walker, Jr and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee v. Blagojevich et al
as 1:2008cv01300
Plaintiff: Ira Lee, III
Defendant: Rod R Blagojevich, Roger E Walker, Jr, Jeffery Hart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Walker et al
as 1:2008cv05247
Plaintiff: Jason B Thomas
Defendant: Roger E. Walker, Jr. and Jorge Montes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01193
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?