Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Ruiz v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2013cv06373
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Michael Ruiz
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Jeffery Travis, Robert Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. Kelly et al
as 2:2013cv05033
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Guy, Sr.
Defendant:
Beverly T. Kelly, Keith Bickham, Robert C Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vicks v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv04773
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Vicks
Defendant:
Robert Tanner, Keith Bickham and Johnny Gerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Wetzel v. Bryan Williams, et al
as 13-30641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN WILLIAMS, ROBERT C. TANNER, KEITH BICKHAM and others
Guy v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2013cv02792
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Guy, Sr.
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Kron v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 13-30272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON J. KRON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, Secretary, STEVE RADER, Regional Warden, ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden and others
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden, KEITH BICKHAM, Deputy Warden, DARRYL MIZELL, Captain and others
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, KEITH BICKHAM, MICHAEL BARBER and others
Wetzel v. Williams et al
as 5:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 5:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Michael Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
