Cases 31 - 40 of 1,596
NORFOLK & DEDHAM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF KEVIN DIPIANO v. CEILCOTE PAINTING, INC.
as 3:2023cv23165
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK & DEDHAM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF KEVIN DIPIANO and NORFOLK & DEDHAM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CEILCOTE PAINTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
SWEENEY v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SWEENEY
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DODSON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, HILLTOP APARTMENTS, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE NEWARK STATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. CAPACITY, LLC
as 3:2023cv23265
Plaintiff:
KEVIN H ADAMS
Defendant:
CAPACITY, LLC and JEFFREY KAIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DODSON v. BANK OF AMERICA'S HEADQUARTERS
as 2:2023cv23398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA'S HEADQUARTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DODSON et al v. MENDEZ et al
as 2:2023cv22797
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON and K. D.
Defendant:
RAYNALDO MENDEZ, NAAZNEEN KHAN, NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NOLASCO v. UNION HOT BAGLE & DELI LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22333
Plaintiff:
Jaime Nolasco
Defendant:
UNION HOT BAGLE & DELI LLC (DBA UNION HOT BAGELS),, Abuabeid M Nayef, Kevin Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
