Cases 31 - 40 of 45
NEAL v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2011cv06350
Petitioner:
WESLEY NEAL
Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Roquet v. Kelly et al
as 4:2011cv01763
Plaintiff:
Cheri Roquet
Defendant:
James Kelly, III, Tammie L. Kelly, Harry Mathias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRATTON v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01190
Petitioner:
ROBERT STRATTON
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2011cv04555
Petitioner:
JERRY LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA L. KELLY PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
JOHNSON v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2011cv00639
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN CLAYTON JOHNSON
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, LINDA L. KELLY and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLY v. W.R. GRACE & CO.
as 2:2010cv83885
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KELLY
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83278
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP., PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP., RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv93727
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON L. KELLY and ANDERSON L. KELLY
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
