Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Nelson v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00140
Petitioner:
Terrance Lamont Nelson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lister v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00180
Petitioner:
Ronnie LaMonte Lister
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warrior v. Town of Lamont
as 5:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Clendon Thomas Warrior
Defendant:
Lamont Town of and Lamont Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jenkins v. Miller
as 4:2009cv00730
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamont Jenkins
Respondent:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Miller
as 5:2009cv01071
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamont Jenkins
Respondent:
David Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Espy et al
as 4:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Joe Lamont Ballard
Defendant:
Thaddeus Espy and Tulsa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisher v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv00260
Petitioner:
Montell Lamonte Fisher
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Emma Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fisher v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00558
Petitioner:
Montell Lamonte Fisher
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Emma Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norris v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2009cv00225
Petitioner:
Cedric Lamont Norris
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fisher v. Paris et al
as 5:2008cv00559
Plaintiff:
Montell Lamonte Fisher
Defendant:
Rick Paris and Randy Matthews
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
