Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
210) 310-0220 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
210) 310-0220 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2009cv01864
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hamel et al
as 6:2009cv00248
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Hamel, John Crawford, H Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 6:2008cv00231
Petitioner:
Wilford Lee Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Texas Dept. of Correction et al
as 5:2008mc00012
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Correction and NFN Cantu
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 2:2008cv00177
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Golden Precision LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00808
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Golden Precision LLC, Golden Precision LLC, Golden Precision LLC's Members and/or Employee Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jeffery et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Jeffery, Donnell Deveon Jenkins, Cheyenne S. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Christina Melton Crain, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
