Cases 31 - 40 of 137
DEJESUS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv20233
Plaintiff:
PEDRO DEJESUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. MCELROY et al
as 2:2021cv17956
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
LARRICK MCELROY, DEVOUGHN MOORE, GUSTAVO FRANCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EADS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv17369
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JUSTIN EADS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HSA C. HANSEN, WARDEN BERGAMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWARD v. BATON et al
as 1:2021cv16375
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAYWARD, JR.
Defendant:
OFFICER BATON, OFFICER FORREST, NURSE ABBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROJAS v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv16006
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. ROJAS
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, TRISH C., MARLEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. GUTTENBERG et al
as 2:2021cv15002
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY H. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP GUTTENBERG, GUTTENBERG POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE DIRECTOR JOEL MAGENHEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KACHWALLA et al v. TOWNSHIP OF EDISON et al
as 2:2021cv13944
Plaintiff:
Mustufa T Kachwalla, Debra Kachwalla, Cassidy Kachwalla and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, EDISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Detective Daniel Hansson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITING v. STOWE et al
as 1:2021cv12725
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT STOWE and SERGEANT LIBERTY
Plaintiff:
ADELBERT A. WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYES v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv12151
Defendant:
JANE DOE NURSE 2, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICER BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MAYES
3Rd Party Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
