Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Figg v. Schafer et al
as 3:2016cv02020
Defendant:
Brian Chenoweth, Jeffrey S. Frasier, Sam Friedenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Axtell Figg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Hicks v. USA
as 6:2016cv01289
Petitioner:
Benjamin Lloyd Hicks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reed v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv01042
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jason Lloyd Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Trackwell v. Homan
as 3:2016cv00496
Defendant:
Jary Homan
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Trackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sullivan v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
as 3:2015cv00926
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Plaintiff:
Gerald R. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Bepple et al v. Shelton et al
as 3:2015cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Neal Bepple and Bridgette Lewis
Defendant:
David Brown, Alana Bruns, M.A. James Coulter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boardman et al v. Pacific Seafood Group et al
as 1:2015cv00108
Amicu:
Attorney General of the State of Oregon
Defendant:
Bandon Pacific, Inc., Bio-Oregon Properties, LLC, Bio-Oregon Protein, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Boardman, MY Fisheries, Inc., Miss Sarah, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Lewis v. Washington County Jail et al
as 3:2014cv01902
Defendant:
Harold Lloyd Lewis, Michael A. Schmidt, Washington County Courthouse and others
Plaintiff:
John Paul Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
