Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Rose v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Lamar Rose
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01128
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lattimore v. Tennessee, State of, et al
as 3:2017cv01137
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lamar Lattimore
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Department, Tennessee, State of and Core Civics MDCDF CCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Jones et al
as 1:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Martin
Defendant:
Lamar Jones and 24th Judicial Drug Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staggs et al v. Kem V. Davis Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02795
Plaintiff:
Lilure Maedreau Staggs , Simon Staggs and Jeremiah Dicks
Defendant:
Kem V. Davis Trucking, Inc. and Kennis Lamar Paige
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ragland v. USA
as 3:2016cv00597
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rufus Lamar Ragland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Love-Quezaire v. Lane Construction Corporation, The et al
as 3:2016cv02072
Plaintiff:
Lamar A. Love-Quezaire
Defendant:
Lane Construction Corporation, The , AECOM C&E, Inc. , AECOM Services, Inc. and others
Cross_plaintiff:
Lane Construction Corporation, The
Cross_defendant:
AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01022
Plaintiff:
Teddrick Lamar Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Champion v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 3:2015cv00338
Plaintiff:
Adam Lamar Champion
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
