Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Fletcher v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00152
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Hartford Community Corr Ctr, Walter Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar Fletcher on behalf of the Estate of Deranna Fletcher v. ct department of corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Defendant:
ct department of corrections, Hartford Correctional Institute, Walter Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Fletcher on behalf of the Estate of Deranna Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodhouse v. New Haven Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Lamar Woodhouse
Defendant:
New Haven Police Department, John Doe and K-9-Police Dog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrich et al v. Yoder
as 3:2014cv00347
Plaintiff:
Doreen Goodrich and Lamar Goodrich
Defendant:
Nicholas L. Yoder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avila et al v. O'Connell et al
as 3:2011cv01641
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Avila , Miguel Avila , Noraima Avila and others
Defendant:
Dennis O'Connell , Francisco Ortiz , Jeff Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bradley v. Abrams et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Terrance Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2010cv01390
Plaintiff:
Solomon Lamar
Defendant:
City Of Waterbury , Francis Brevetti , Michael Gugliotti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. Hartford Police Dept et al
as 3:2010cv01048
Plaintiff:
Lamar McCarthy
Defendant:
Hartford Police Dept, Anthony Pia , Citta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar v. Social Security Admin
as 3:2010cv00566
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lamar
Defendant:
Social Security Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woodhouse v. Ridley et al
as 3:2008cv01260
Plaintiff:
Lamar Woodhouse
Defendant:
Jane Ridley and Dept of Pub Safety Scientific Svc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
