Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Rogers v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv00290
Movant: Jupiter Lamar Rogers
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Goodlett v. USA
as 4:2009cv00774
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Christopher Lamar Goodlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hill v. Witt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00270
Plaintiff: LaRandall Lamar Hill
Defendant: Chris Witt, Jeff Henderson, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rushing v. USA
as 4:2008cv00537
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Timothy Lamar Rushing
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis v. Citty et al
as 5:2007cv01375
Plaintiff: Dupree Lamar Davis
Defendant: Bill Citty, Oklahoma City, City of and Ryan Scweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Citty et al
as 5:2007cv01009
Petitioner: Dupree Lamar Davis
Respondent: William Citty and Oklahoma City Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Oklahoma City Municipal Court
as 5:2007cv00703
Plaintiff: Dupree Lamar Davis
Defendant: Oklahoma City Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC v. Covey et al
as 6:2007cv00101
Plaintiff: Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC and Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC
Defendant: Paul Covey, Paul Covey, KEM Texas, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Fryar v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2007cv00140
Petitioner: Gerald Lamar Fryar
Respondent: Oklahoma State of, Thomas C Peterson and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?