Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Foreman v. Gwathney, et al. (INMATE 2)(LEAD CASE)
as 2:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney
Consolidated Defendant:
Cliff Walker, Charles Graddick and Dwayne Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treva Thompson, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 21-10034
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIUS GAMBLE, TREVA THOMPSON, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, TIMOTHY LANIER, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES SNIPES, III, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Montgomery County Board of Registrars and on behalf of a class of all voter registrars in the State of Alabama, LEIGH GWATHNEY, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Board of Pardons and Paroles and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Crenshaw v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00950
Defendant:
Dwayne Spurlock, Leigh Gwathney and Cliff Walker
Plaintiff:
Irby James Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinchon v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Kay Ivey, Leigh Gwathney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Pinchon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiarizio v. Murrill et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Karla Walker Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Gwathney et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Clifford Walker and Leigh Gwathney
Plaintiff:
Kendall Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
