Cases 31 - 40 of 167
(HC) Quintero v. Lemon
as 1:2022cv01568
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Quintero
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emanuele Trombini v. Tristan Lemon
as 2:2022cv08968
Petitioner:
Emanuele Trombini
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Jones v. Lemon et al
as 5:2022cv07202
Plaintiff:
Terrell Jones
Defendant:
T. Lemon and Howard Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reyes v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Reuben Joseph Reyes
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Howard E. Moseley, Ron Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernando Duarte v. Tristan Lemon
as 2:2022cv07590
Petitioner:
Fernando Duarte
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Younghoom Shin v. Tristan Lemon
as 8:2022cv01850
Petitioner:
Edward Younghoon Shin
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godoy v. Allen et al
as 3:2022cv07006
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Godoy
Defendant:
Associate Warden Trent Allen, Lopez, Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Lemon et al
as 1:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
Terrell Jones
Defendant:
T. Lemon and Howard Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
American General Life Insurance Company v. Bushman et al
as 1:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
American General Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sharon Bushman, Heather K. Litz and Micklos Lemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
