Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Golueke v. Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC et al.
as 1:2016cv03600
Plaintiff:
Mark Richard Golueke
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC , Sunbeam Products, Inc. d/b/a Jarden Consumer Solutions and Dongguan Ho Li Electric Appliance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golueke v. Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03484
Plaintiff:
Mark Richard Golueke
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Improvement, LLC, Sunbeam Products, Inc. d/b/a Jarden Consumer Solutions and DONGGUAN HO LI ELECTRIC APPLIANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liu v. Bank of America N.A.
as 8:2016cv02924
Plaintiff:
Li-Man Liu
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Che v. Chang et al
as 8:2016cv02665
Plaintiff:
Li Che
Defendant:
Hsien Cheng Chang and Wasserman, Mancini & Chang, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHINA POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. et al v. SONG et al
as 8:2016cv01309
Plaintiff:
CHINA POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. , AN SEN (XI'AN) POWER SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and CONCORDE EQUITY II, LLC
Defendant:
YONGZING SONG, XI'AN AMORPHOUS ALLOY ZHONGXI TRANSFORMER CO. LTD, ELAINE ZHAO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Wantz
as 1:2015cv03008
Plaintiff:
Darlene Ruth Lis Brown
Defendant:
Adam Scott Wantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fan et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv02686
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and David L. Roark
Plaintiff:
Zhuoying Fan and Ling Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02282
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wu v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01366
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Tien Li -Shou Wu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
United States of America v. $11,795.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2012cv02875
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,795.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Man Wai Mandy Li
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.