Cases 31 - 40 of 40
DAY v. WARDEN
as 1:2011cv00256
Petitioner:
GREGORY ALLEN DAY
Respondent:
M MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Prescott et al v. Alejo et al
as 2:2009cv00791
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Jorg Busse
Defendant:
Roger Alejo, Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Jack N. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Prescott et al v. Alejo et al
as 9:2009cv82359
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Jorg Busse
Defendant:
Roger Alejo, Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Jack N. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Martin v. United States of America
as 9:2009cv82296
Plaintiff:
Marcus M Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prescott et al v. Black et al
as 2:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Jorg Busse
Defendant:
Susan H. Black, Stanley F. Birch, Stanley Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Martin v. State Of Florida
as 8:2009cv00474
Plaintiff:
Theresa M. Martin
Defendant:
State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2008cv81510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Martin et al
as 2:2008cv00797
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Parker
Defendant:
M. Martin and Aramark Correctional Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martins v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 5:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lucia M. Martins
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 8:2007cv02111
Plaintiff:
Glenda M. Martin
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
