Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Rodriguez v. City of La Villa Texas et al
as 7:2013cv00400
Defendant:
City of La Villa Texas and Hector Elizondo
Plaintiff:
Antonia M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rodriguez et al v. DePuy Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03468
Plaintiff:
Viviano A. Rodriguez and Suzette M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. B & C Painting & Wallcovering, LLC
as 4:2011cv04438
Defendant:
B & C Painting & Wallcovering, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ediberto M Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garner v. Gutierrez, Jr et al
as 2:2011cv00320
Plaintiff:
Willi Free I Garner
Defendant:
Ernest Gutierrez, Jr, Robert Crites, Norris D Jackson and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Jester IV Unit et al
as 4:2011cv01776
Plaintiff:
Pedro M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jester IV Unit and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadley v. City of Arlington, Texas et al
as 4:2010cv00453
Plaintiff:
Vincent G. Wadley
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas and Juan M. Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Salinas
as 1:2009cv00243
Petitioner:
Paula M Rodriguez
Respondent:
Sandra Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rodriguez v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00247
Petitioner:
Jose M Rodriguez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
