Cases 31 - 40 of 45
FROMER v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv00452
Defendant:
ANDREA STROUP, TARA, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS P. FROMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
H. CHRISTIAN DEBUYN, DAVID DONAHUE, J. WYNN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. COLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHTEN v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2019cv00229
Defendant:
S. CHAPMAN, RICHARD BROWN, I.D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY KNIGHTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCRUGGS v. SIMS et al
as 2:2018cv00460
Defendant:
KEVIN GILMORE, WILSON, DICK BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2018cv00803
Defendant:
Amy Eichmeier, Matt Leohr, Andrew Pazera and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00430
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, KEVIN GILMORE, MATT LEOHR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT v. NEAL et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
DEBBIE ABRAM, PAM BANE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEABROOKS v. OSBURN et al
as 2:2017cv00490
Defendant:
MATT LEOHR, MICHAEL OSBURN, RANDALL PURCELL and others
Plaintiff:
KEREL L SEABROOKS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2017cv01845
Defendant:
TIM AXSOM, BRION BERTCH, JOELYNN BIGHEART and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZIEMER v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2017cv00076
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY, MATT LEOHR and GREG SANDERS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
EDWARD THEODORE ZIEMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
