Cases 31 - 40 of 62
MAXWELL v. YORK et al
as 2:2017cv00142
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, K. HOBSEN, KNUST and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY T. MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. Gary Indiana City of, et al
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Gia Melton
Defendant:
Angenette C Earls , PK Management LLC , Maxwell's Glass and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MAXWELL v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Defendant:
ALLEN, BENNETT, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY T. MAXWELL
Miscellaneou:
WVCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKELLOP-MAXWELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02095
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE MCKELLOP-MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MAXWELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01071
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CHANDA MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOODY v. MAXWELL et al
as 4:2015cv00167
Defendant:
JIM MOOTZ TRUCKING, LLC and CHARLES MAXWELL
Plaintiff:
PAM MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
LANDIS v. GRIFFIN
as 2:2015cv00319
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner:
MAXWELL LANDIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxwell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Maxwell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MAXWELL v. REFRIGIWEAR INC.
as 1:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
GREG MAXWELL
Defendant:
REFRIGIWEAR INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MAXWELL v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00994
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC R. MAXWELL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
