Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Williams v. Temple et al
as 1:2019cv08476
Defendant: Jacob Temple, Lee Zeitlin, Louis Dattomo and others
Plaintiff: Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. May et al
as 1:2019cv01390
Defendant: Kim .Z, Chris Gilbert, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff: Robert W Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oliver, et al v. Riddell, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07766
Plaintiff: Michael Pelton, Willard Harrell, LaBrandon Toefield and others
Defendant: BRG Sports Holding Corp., BRG Sports, LLC, All American Sports Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Secretary of Veteran Affairs et al
as 1:2019cv06931
Defendant: Isaac Tolekidis, Anthony Burke, Mary Odiase and others
Plaintiff: Joanne Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mong v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2019cv06007
Defendant: Steven Quaintance McKenzie and City of Chicago Department of Law
Plaintiff: Agwu Mong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv01863
Defendant: Jane Doe, Lieutenant Williams, Thomas Dart and others
Plaintiff: Jesse Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvillo v. Domma et al
as 1:2019cv01524
Plaintiff: Fidel Calvillo
Defendant: Deon A. McKenzie, II, Franco Domma, Lt. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKenzie v. McCormick et al
as 3:2019cv50007
Defendant: fisher, John R Varga, J Chess and others
Plaintiff: Darnell McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway et al v. AT&T Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv06975
Plaintiff: Bridgett Tift, Mary Hanley, James Bloch and others
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mong v. Mckenzie et al
as 1:2018cv06979
Plaintiff: Agwu Mong
Defendant: City of Chicago, The and Steven Quintance Mckenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?