Cases 31 - 40 of 514
(HC) Mejia v. Allen
as 2:2023cv02823
Petitioner:
Geronimo Mejia
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bailey v. Mejia et al
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bailey
Defendant:
R. Mejia, J. Martinez, D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Mejia Avila et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
David Mejia Avila, Yaneli Franco, Delilah Mejia and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bate et al v. Securly, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Sheri Bate and Azucena Mejia
Defendant:
Securly, Inc.
Alvaro Mejia v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
as 5:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Mejia
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, State Farm Bank FSB and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ruben Mejia et al v. Amanda Young et al
as 5:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mejia, G.M. and LM.M
Defendant:
Amanda Young, Jason Phelps and Riverside County Childrens Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Daniel Govind v. State of California et al
as 5:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Govind
Defendant:
State of California, California Institution For Men, James S. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
