Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Miguel Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01438
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brigida et al v. Valk et al
as 3:2018cv01443
Plaintiff:
Sean VB Brigida , TeShaun J Allen , Juan Arismendez and others
Defendant:
Ronald C Valk , Robert Shawn Valk and LIV Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
David Russell v. Cameron County Sheriff, et al
as 18-40439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN CARILLO, Jailer, MIGUEL SANCHEZ, JR., Jailer, GEORGE GARCIA, Jailer Captain and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Miguel Sanchez-Quintana
as 17-50196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MIGUEL ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ-QUINTANA, AKA Miguel Alejandro Sanchez, AKA Miguel Sanchez Vasquez
Sanchez v. Carnival Cruise Lines Inc.,
as 1:2017cv21877
Plaintiff:
Miguel Sanchez
Defendant:
Carnival Cruise Lines Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. The New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv03516
Plaintiff:
Andy Rodriguez
Defendant:
James Garcia, Anderson Ortiz, Miguel Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linda Sanchez Zuniga, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71156
Petitioner:
LINDA MARIELA GUADALUPE SANCHEZ ZUNIGA, DANIELA LIZETH CARDENAS SANCHEZ, HILARIA DAYANA CARDENAS SANCHEZ and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Juan Gomez, et al v. Loomis Armored US, L.L.C.
as 17-90012
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JUAN GOMEZ, FRANK PARTIDA, BENJAMIN ALCALA and others
Defendant - Respondent:
LOOMIS ARMORED US, L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
