Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Ledcke v. PA Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv02298
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Ledcke
Defendant:
PA Dept of Corrections, John Szymanski, Betti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shover v. York County Prison et al
as 3:2011cv02248
Plaintiff:
Richard Paul Shover, II
Defendant:
Mary E. Sabol, Albert J. Sabol, The County of York York County Prison Mailroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES EMBASSY et al
as 2:2011cv04966
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EMBASSY, JOHN DOE, JOSEPH AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAPHA-HOLDING AG et al v. SEIDEL ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 5:2009cv04973
Plaintiff:
GRAPHA-HOLDING AG and MULLER MARTINI MAILROOM SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
SEIDEL ENTERPRISES, INC. and RANDY SEIDEL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Jennings et al v. Tanner et al
as 3:2009cv00356
Plaintiff:
Troy Jennings and USP Allenwood Inmates
Defendant:
Mark Tanner, R. Martinez, USP Allenwood Mailroom Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DREHER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRESTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2008cv04177
Plaintiff:
JOHN DREHER
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRESTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN/ASST. WARDEN, ETC. and MAILROOM EMPLOYEES, ETC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aherndt v. Sniezek et al
as 1:2008cv01256
Plaintiff:
William E Aherndt
Defendant:
T. R. Sniezek, Officer Snieder and Mailroom Officers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CATCHINGS v. FIKE et al
as 1:2007cv00283
Plaintiff:
PRESTON CATCHINGS
Defendant:
FIKE, HENRY, MALIMASTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00345
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Hale
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, Randall N. Sears, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
