Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Moye v. People of the State of California
as 4:2013cv05624
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moye v. People of State of California
as 4:2013cv05405
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moye v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv02173
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
United States Government, City and County of San Francisco, Lydia Dianne Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moye v. Gascon et al
as 4:2013cv01821
Petitioner:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Respondent:
George Gascon and Ross Mirikarimi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moye v. Gascon et al
as 4:2013cv01785
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
George Gascon and Ross Mirikarimi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moye v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2013cv01240
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, State of California, Lydia Dianne Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moye v. People of the State of California
as 4:2012cv00968
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malinka Moye v. Lydia Baca, et al
as 10-17400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALINKA TACUMA WADE MOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
LYDIA DIANNE BACA and RACHCAEL YOUNG
Malinka Moye v. City & County of San Francisco
as 10-15185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALINKA TACUMA WADE MOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Malinka Moye v. Myriad Ventures Inc., et al
as 10-15111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALINKA TACUMA WADE MOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
MYRIAD VENTURES INC., DBA Bay Car Stereo and JACK CHEW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
