Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Phillips v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, et al
as 3:2016cv02227
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Phillips
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, North Central Correctional Complex, Management and Training Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 1:2016cv00879
Petitioner:
Tyrelle Webster
Respondent:
Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Durdin v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 2:2016cv00355
Petitioner:
Henry A Durdin, Jr
Respondent:
Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Ohio Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00237
Plaintiff:
Darin E. Morris
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Corrections, Covak, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 1:2015cv02120
Petitioner:
Jonathan J. Powell
Respondent:
Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Mohr et al
as 3:2015cv01675
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Wilson
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Mona Parks, Dr. Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez Perry v. Warden, Mansfield Correction
as 15-3630
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARQUEZ PERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, MANSFIELD CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Aaron Scott v. Warden, Mansfield Correctiona
as 15-3017
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, MANSFIELD CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Thuener v. Ohio Dept of Rehab & Corr. et al
as 1:2014cv02645
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W Thuener
Defendant:
Ohio Dept of Rehab & Corr. and Mansfield Correctional Institution Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shashawn Williams v. Alan Lazaroff
as 14-3561
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHASHAWN WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ALAN J. LAZAROFF, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
