Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Rojas et al v. Delizia Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv06477
Plaintiff:
Elias Rojas, Juan Alejandro, Edgar Benjamin and others
Defendant:
Delizia Restaurant Corp. doing business as Delizia 73 Ristorante & Pizza, Frank Liparoto and Frank Pecora
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01434
Defendant:
Gregory Lee Hoover, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Naphcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Ramirez v. USDC-CASJ
as 12-70564
:
In re: ANTHONY MARCO RAMIREZ
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MARCO RAMIREZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
JAMES A. YATES
Marco Ramirez Samuel v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-73669
Petitioner:
MARCO TULIO RAMIREZ SAMUEL, AKA Marco Ramirez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RAMIREZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58886
Plaintiff:
MARCOS RAMIREZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Marcos Ramirez-Garcia v. Debra Scutt
as 11-1973
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCOS RAMIREZ-GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBRA SCUTT, Warden
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, Ltda., v. Pinacle Trading Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv20476
Plaintiff:
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, LTDA.
Defendant:
Pinacle Trading Corp., Marco Ramirez, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Ramirez v. James Yates, et al
as 10-17409
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY MARCO RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES and JEANNE WOODFORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
