Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Mayes v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2019cv00355
Plaintiff:
SALINA MAYES
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Mayes et al v. 490 Habitat, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01427
Plaintiff:
Ursula Mayes, Joanna Krupa, Cielo Jean Gibson and others
Defendant:
Samuel Ripps, 490 Habitat, Inc. and 490 Habitat, Inc. doing business as The Oasis Gentlemen's Club
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Read v. Bell et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
David Paul Read
Defendant:
Benjamin Bell, Vandyken, R. Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. USA
as 1:2017cv06789
Petitioner:
Antoine Mayes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pizarro v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv06506
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro, Edwin Hernandez, Antonio Chavarria and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohning et al v. The City and State of New York
as 1:2017cv06441
Plaintiff:
Peter Bohning, Jose Pizarro, Juel Roundtree and others
Defendant:
The City and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wapniak et al v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2017cv02799
Defendant:
City of New York , Eric Brettschneider , Mitch Gipson and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Wapniak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. USA
as 1:2017cv02200
Petitioner:
Anthony Mayes, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mayes v. USA
as 1:2017cv02198
Petitioner:
Anthony Mayes, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv01819
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mayes
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
