Cases 31 - 40 of 296
Caruth v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv10340
Plaintiff:
James Caruth
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 1:2016cv09534
Plaintiff:
Swaysey Rankin
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Michael Lemke, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala v. J. Clements et al
as 1:2016cv09472
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ayala
Defendant:
J. Clements, Joel Shaw, W. Barlog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Miller v. Michael Lemke, et al
as 16-3542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LEMKE, SALEH OBAISI, Doctor, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and others
Taylor v. Magarvie et al
as 1:2016cv01336
Plaintiff:
Terence Taylor
Defendant:
Major Magarvie , Malkowski , Tralon Durrett and others
Movant:
Nixon Peabody LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Miller v. Michael Lemke, et al
as 16-3252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LEMKE, SALEH OBAISI, Doctor, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and others
Cole v. Lemke et al
as 1:2016cv07845
Plaintiff:
Richard Cole
Defendant:
Michael Lemke, Wexford Health Sources, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemke v. Davis
as 4:2016cv02118
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Lemke
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caruth v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06621
Plaintiff:
James Caruth
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boswell v. Hardy et al
as 1:2016cv05282
Plaintiff:
Martell Boswell
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Amy Bartlett and Michael Lemke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
