Cases 31 - 40 of 884
Kelmendi v. Michigan Office of Retirement Services et al
as 2:2023cv13172
Plaintiff:
John Kelmendi
Defendant:
Michigan Office of Retirement Services, Detroit Board of Education, Detroit Public Schools and others
Glynn et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv13161
Plaintiff:
Mary Glynn, David Proehl, Dustin Riggs and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, DOES 1 through 100 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Scott v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2023cv13125
Plaintiff:
Donald Dee Scott
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi E. Washington, Kim Cargor and others
Tucker v. Quinones et al
as 5:2023cv13120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Tucker
Defendant:
Nicole Michelle Quinones and Rio Reed
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Love v. Michigan Property Resources et al
as 2:2023cv12944
Plaintiff:
Michell Love
Defendant:
Michigan Property Resources and Angela W Montgomery
Watts v. Good Cakes and Bakes, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12906
Plaintiff:
Talicia Watts
Defendant:
Good Cakes and Bakes, LLC Doing business as Good Cakes and Bakes, April Anderson and Michelle Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tucker v. Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters et al
as 2:2023cv12865
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tucker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters, Troy Bevier and Nicole Michelle
Gresham #272603 v. Hemmer et al
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Unknown Hemmer, Michelle Gilbert and Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis #421256 v. LaJoye-Young
as 1:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lewis #421256
Defendant:
Michelle LaJoye-Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
