Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Henry, et al
as 10-7026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally-recognized Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General of Oklahoma, OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION and others
Kelly, et al v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation
as 4:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Patricia Kelly and Gene Kelly
Defendant:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Defendant:
Brad Henry, W.A. Drew Edmondson, Oklahoma Tax Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 09-5123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, THOMAS E. KEMP, JR., Chairman of the Tax Commission, JERRY JOHNSON, Warden, Vice-Chairman of the Tax Commission and others
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
as 4:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation, Muscogee (Creek) Nation, Muscogee (Creek) Nation and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Tax Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muscogee Creek Nation Division of Housing et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2008cv02583
Plaintiff:
Muscogee Creek Nation Division of Housing, Cherokee Nation Housing Authority, Comanche Nation Housing Authority and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Alphonso Jackson, Deborah Lalancette and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States ex rel. v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation of OK, et al
as 08-7064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. JACK, ex rel. United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION OF OKLAHOMA and HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CREEK NATION OF OKLAHOMA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
