Cases 31 - 40 of 113
THOMAS v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00447
Petitioner:
DUANE BROCK THOMAS
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'CONNOR v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01651
Petitioner:
KENNETH O'CONNOR
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLICK v. GIROUX et al
as 3:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
JASON RAY FLICK
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00400
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE T. WHITE
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TARPLEY v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00345
Petitioner:
VICTOR TARPLEY
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUDOLPH v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01293
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RUDOLPH
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MYER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MYER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, NANCY GIROUX, DAVID E. ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Giroux et al
as 1:2015cv00350
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Vazquez
Respondent:
Nancy Giroux and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNYDERS v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00521
Petitioner:
RIJAN S. SNYDERS
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MADDREY v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00487
Petitioner:
DENNIS MADDREY
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
