Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Stemplinger v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04371
Plaintiff:
Neal Stemplinger
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayward et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04038
Plaintiff:
Neal Hayward and Cecilia Hayward
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03807
Plaintiff:
Eugene Neal
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keller et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03300
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Neal Keller and Barbara Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutton v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02701
Petitioner:
Richard Neal Sutton
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maduena v. Goddard et al
as 2:2017cv01584
Plaintiff:
Genaro Lopez Maduena
Defendant:
Terry Goddard, L Lusk and Kelly Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neal v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01162
Plaintiff:
Ray W Neal
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00644
Plaintiff:
Jerry Neal Coleman and Pamela J Coleman
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nickolich et al v. Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center et al
as 2:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II, Howeard E Valentine, Clarence Brooks and others
Defendant:
Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center, Shanda Payne, Dave Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal #158933 v. Wilmot
as 2:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Neal
Defendant:
Leon Wilmot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
